Why Michigan needs one …
Key elements of a new electric energy policy …
- Reforming Michigan’s Electric Choice Program to define regulated and choice markets, providing sufficient certainty to invest in new power plants
| |
|
- Enabling Michigan’s regulated utilities to build the power plants that our state will need in the years ahead.
- Adopting policies to encourage renewable energy development and utility-managed energy efficiency programs
- Implementing a new, incentive-based regulatory framework
Michigan's future requires a new electric energy policy …
-
To avoid spiraling electric rates
States that deregulated their electric industries are experiencing soaring rates
- Maryland: Baltimore Gas & Electric customers are grappling with a 48 percent increase
- Illinois: Commonwealth Edison and Ameren customers are seeing average increases of up to 55 percent. Some Ameren customers have seen their monthly bills increase 200 percent or more
- Virginia repealed its electric deregulation law effective July 1, 2007, to protect customers from rate shock
-
To keep electric service reliable, safe and affordable
Detroit Edison went from 1994 to 2004 without a rate increase. In fact it was able to decrease its rates 5% per cent for all customers because it was able to save hundreds of millions of dollars by refinancing its debt on Fermi 2.
A new regulatory structure will help to manage future rate increases and avoid the rate shocks that electric users in other states have experienced.
-
-
To meet Michigan's future energy needs
The 21st Century Energy Report, authored by the former chair of the MPSC, lays the foundation to achieve safe, reliable, affordable power for Michigan's future.
- It projects that the state's demand for electricity will grow roughly 1.2 percent annually.
- It cites the need for new baseload power plants to be built over the next decade to meet that demand.
- It acknowledges that the Electric Choice Program is a barrier to new plant construction.
- It recommends legislative action to address the problem.
Michigan's current hybrid regulatory structure fails to provide investors the certainty they require to invest the billions of dollars new plants would require.
- Between 2004 and 2006, Detroit Edison and Consumers Energy experienced a swing of over 3,000 megawatts of load from the regulated utilities to alternative suppliers and back again. That's equal to two baseload power plants.
-
To enhance energy efficiency across the state
- Energy efficiency information, programs and tools need to be deployed fairly and cost-effectively to electricity consumers across the state.
-
To develop new renewable energy resources
- Tapping Michigan's renewable energy resources is a priority for the State.
- Renewable energy investments will help to further diversify Michigan's electric generation portfolio and its economy.
- Achieving the renewable energy goals put forth in the 21st Century Energy Plan will require significant utility involvement. But that involvement is hindered by the Electric Choice Program.
-
To help Michigan attract businesses and jobs
- Business growth requires stable energy prices. Customers in deregulated states have seen their electricity prices spiral as wholesale power costs have increased.
- A new regulatory model would enable special energy pricing programs.
* To view and print this information, you need Adobe® Acrobat® Reader.